|
The News Headlines
Wednesday July 1, 2009 |
Letters to the Editor
Promaccom
Fine Accommodation
From The Mirror, June
28, 1989 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Bridging a gap at the Prom |
 |
INSTALLATION of a new footbridge for hikers on the popular Sealers Cove walk
in Wilsons Promontory National Park has now been completed.
The new 18-metre long, four-tonne bridge was constructed for Parks Victoria
in Geelong and transported to Sealers Cove for final construction and
installation on site.
The new bridge is made of curved steel with timber decking and is designed
to be unobtrusive in the surrounding environment.
Acting Chief Ranger at the Prom, Brett Mitchell, said that given the remote
location it was necessary to transport the bridge via barge to its location,
making the replacement of the bridge a complex logistical project.
“It was important to ensure the bridge was durable enough to last, so many
hikers can enjoy the stunning scenery at Sealers Cove, which forms part of
the Prom’s most popular hike, the ‘southern circuit’”, he said.
Sealers Cove is a three-hour walk from Telegraph Saddle car park and only
accessible to hikers.
“The circuit also takes in Refuge Cove and Little Waterloo Bay and loops
back up to the Telegraph Saddle car park. The 35.5 km walk can be done over
one, two or three nights. It offers breathtaking views of the Prom’s
pristine eastern beaches, steep ascents over open granite rock faces, gentle
walks on boardwalks through ferny glades and hikes through eucalypt
woodland,” said Mr Mitchell.
“The replacement of the bridge is part of a number of upgrades to facilities
and services at Tidal River and throughout Wilsons Promontory National Park.
“The park is a very special place for many Victorians and we are committed
to improving visitor facilities for the enjoyment of all in the future.”
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Fish market – onward into
uncharted waters |
 |
|
THE City of Melbourne has given a temporary reprieve to the Melbourne
Wholesale Fish Market, which had been due to close at the end of June, with
dire consequences for the fishing industry across Victoria.
The City owns the site currently leased by the company that operates the
market, a business with an estimated $1.5 billion annual turnover.
Two years ago it warned its tenants that they would have to be out by the
end of March 2009. That date was then postponed to the end of June.
“The Melbourne Wholesale Fish Market Pty Ltd and the Council are in
discussion with Victrack, which has expressed an interest to purchase the
Fish Market site, and as a result it has been determined to extend the
operation of the Fish Market,” said Cr Brian Shanahan, Chair of the City of
Melbourne’s Finance and Governance Committee.
Cr Shanahan said that the City of Melbourne had been trying to resolve the
issue over the last ten years.
“In 2005 the City of Melbourne offered the site to the 24 traders for
purchase, but an agreement could not be reached. In addition, the CoM has
facilitated contact between the traders and potential developers in an
attempt to resolve the situation.
“Tenants were informed in January 2007 that if negotiations were not
fruitful then Council intended to close the market by 31 March 2009.
“The City of Melbourne has continued to communicate with the tenants
throughout the process and they were aware that they needed to identify an
alternative location and formalise these arrangements.
“This information and Council’s position has been discussed with various
Fish Market representatives in meetings held.
“We are aware that the traders are in the process of progressing the search
for a new site.”
The market directly employs around 200 people on site and around 400
businesses buy direct out of the market.
The market is one of the biggest in Australia, with fish from as far away as
South Australia, Tasmania and New Zealand as well as from Victoria –
including the Corner Inlet area – passing through it.
Corner Inlet fisherman Joe Pinzone calculates that the inlet supplies $2
million plus worth of fish to the market each year.
All his catch – roughly 20 tonnes a year - goes to the market – and he is
keen to see its future secured – in one central location.
He does not want to see its stallholders splintering off to different
locations around Melbourne.
“To break it up like that would destroy competition. We need a central
market with all the buyers and sellers in the one place,” said Mr Pinzone.
“The loss of the market would hurt the local fishing industry - and rural
Victoria,” he said.
The Nationals’ Member for Eastern Region, Peter Hall, raised the issue in
parliament last October, calling on the government to acknowledge the
importance of the commercial fishing industry and work with the Victorian
industry on establishing a new wholesale fish market.
He said the closure of the market would leave commercial fishermen
throughout Victoria at a loss as to where to sell their product.
“What will happen to the wholesale fish industry in Victoria when that
market closes?” Mr Hall asked the parliament.
“The answer is nobody really knows. I guess more product will be sold
through the Sydney fish market which is not the best outcome for the
Victorian economy.”
The State Government has had discussions with the market owners about the
possibility of a move to Epping with the wholesale fruit and vegetable
market.
However, a move to Epping is not popular.
Foster fishmonger John Doran, who sources the seafood he can’t get from
local boats, such as Atlantic salmon, prawns and oysters, from the wholesale
market, said driving to Epping would add too much time to his already long
drive to the market in the early hours of the morning.
He worries, too, that if the stallholders were forced to separate it would
be a nightmare for the retailers and wholesalers who source their products.
“Instead of one regular trip to one destination we would have to go to
several different locations. We need the stalls under one roof to keep
prices competitive,” said Mr Doran.
On the bright side, he is confident that the stallholders are of one mind
and are determined to stick together and keep the facility going –
somewhere. He is hopeful that a solution will be found.
Peter Hall agrees.
He said this week: “My understanding is that the agents are close to
securing a new site for a fish market. Some progress seems to have been
made. I hope that further details can be revealed in the next few weeks.”
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Foster’s future mapped out |
 |
THERE is still time to make last minute comment on the mapping-out of the
locations planned for Foster’s future expansion for industrial, high density
residential, rural living and urban land uses over the next 20 years.
The areas will not be re-zoned immediately, but have been identified for
future investigation for re-zoning in order to encourage staged and
cost-effective development expansion without leap-frogging vacant areas.
Many people will recall the community consultation associated with
development of Foster Town Structure Plan 2008, which was simply an earlier
step in the planning scheme’s amendment process.
The current formal exhibition of the Structure Plan, now re-titled as Foster
Framework Plan, is effectively checking that the community is still happy
with the proposed direction for the town’s future expansion and that nothing
has been missed out or incorrectly designated.
Although the official time for accepting submissions to the proposed changes
to the Shire’s planning scheme [known as Amendment C46 and which contains
proposed changes for several towns in the municipality] closed yesterday,
Council usually accepts late submissions.
With the report to Council on the Amendment’s submissions likely to be put
to Council in August, in practice late submissions are likely to be accepted
until mid-July.
The map included in the amendment indicates changes as follows:
· Proposed expansion for potential urban residential area into two
locations. The larger area would be bounded to the north by the golf course
and Boundary Road, to the east by Stockyard Creek and to the south by the
Great Southern Rail Trail. The slightly smaller proposed new urban area is
south-west of the town, and is bordered by Hoddle Road to the east, and
located between Foster Cemetery to the south and the rear of houses facing
Charles Street and Byrne Street to the north-east and north respectively.
· High density residential development may occur within 200 metres of the
designated town centre.
· Two areas for potential future Rural Living Zone. One large area south of
both Jay Road and the cemetery and bisected by Hoddle Road, as well as a
smaller Y-shaped area to the town’s north-west, bisected by Cooper Street
and bordered in part to the east by Stockyard Creek.
· A potential town centre expansion area on the west side of Pioneer Street
in the vicinity of Bridge Steet, where the Council depot is currently
located.
· A future potential industrial area on the east side of Fullers Road,
located immediately south of the existing industrial area on the Lower
Franklin Road, which would effectively double the size of the industrial
zone.
While some of the expansion would result in loss of land from farming, the
development allows for staged accommodation of anticipated population growth
around Foster, which is the main service and commercial centre in the
eastern section of the Shire.
Although demand for industrial land in Foster is currently quiet, future
port-related developments in Corner Inlet could change this situation.
Township planning provisions in the Municipal Strategic Statement, which
have not been changed since the current planning scheme commenced in late
1999, will also be refined to provide better guidance for long term visions
for the development of Foster and the other larger towns in the Shire.
[The exception is for Korumburra, which is still in earlier investigation
stages of the process due to issues relating to the former saleyards site].
A copy of Amendment C46, of which pages 18-20 concentrate on Foster, can be
downloaded from the Council’s web site at www.south
gippsland.vic.gov.au [select the link from the home page] or it can be
viewed as a hard copy at Foster Library.
For inquiries about the Amendment and making a submission, contact Ken
Griffiths in Council’s Planning Department on 5662 9236.
Ends
• Anyone wishing to make a final comment about proposed changes [Amendment
C46] to the South Gippsland Shire Planning Scheme in relation to future
expansion areas for Foster and other towns in the municipality needs to act
as soon as possible to put in a submission. Foster Framework Plan indicates
future locations for rural living, urban and industrial areas.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Human Swine Flu – mild and
manageable |
 |
|
THERE have been no confirmed cases of H1N1 Influenza 09 (Human Swine Flu) in
the Foster area, although cases of it have been reported in South Gippsland
and numerous people have experienced flu-like symptoms – as is common for
this time of year.
Dr David Iser of Foster Medical Centre said there was definitely no need for
panic.
“Swine flu does not appear to be as severe as originally feared. Routine
tests for swine flu are not being carried out – this is in accordance with
government recommendations - so we wouldn’t know if we are seeing swine flu
or not, but we have not seen anyone desperately ill with flu,” he said.
Victoria is now in the ‘Protect’ phase of its pandemic plan for dealing with
Human Swine Flu. This means:
Limiting school closures – instead the focus is on keeping school children
with acute flu-like illness at home, away from school;
Controlling outbreaks in high-risk institutional settings, such as special
schools and aged care facilities;
Treating people from high-risk groups, such as pregnant women, those with
respiratory disease (such as asthma), heart disease, diabetes, renal
disease, morbid obesity and immunosuppression.
People with mild flu-like symptoms are asked to stay at home until they are
well. However, contacts will not be placed into quarantine.
TAMIFLU
Tamiflu is an antiviral medication that can be prescribed by a doctor to
prevent the flu virus spreading inside your body. In the ‘Protect’ phase
Tamiflu is not provided to people who have mild flu-like symptoms, unless
they belong to a high-risk group or setting. Currently the vast majority of
people experience mild flu-like symptoms and make a rapid and full recovery
without receiving any medical treatment.
The Department of Human Services advises that people can minimise their
chances of catching and spreading Human Swine Flu by adopting good hygiene
practices:
Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when you cough or sneeze;
Throw the tissue in a plastic-lined rubbish bin after you use it;
Wash your hands often with soap and water, especially after you cough or
sneeze. Alcohol-based hand cleaners are also effective;
Avoid touching your eyes, nose or mouth. Germs spread that way.
SYMPTOMS
The symptoms of Human Swine Flu in people are similar to the symptoms of
regular flu and include fever, cough, runny or stuffy nose, sore throat,
body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. Some people have diarrhoea and
vomiting associated with Human Swine Flu. Like seasonal flu, the symptoms of
Human Swine Flu can vary from mild to severe.
A person should seek medical care if they experience shortness of breath or
difficulty breathing, especially if they are concerned about symptoms, or
they become worse.
FLU MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL
The local medical centres are following Department of Human Services
protocol to manage H1N1, as practice nurse Nancy Audrians explained:
“If people ringing to make an appointment suspect they have Swine Flu they
will be asked to wait in their car once they arrive at the medical centre,
let reception know when they have arrived (ring through by mobile phone if
possible), and when it is their turn the doctor will go out under strict
infection control conditions (e.g. gown and mask) to see them. Before the
doctor goes back inside he (or she) will follow the infection control
procedures and remove gown, mask, etc.”
For the most up-to-date information visit www.health.vic.gov.au or
call the National Influenza Hotline on 180 2007 or call Nurse-on-Call on
1300 606 024.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
IN THE SWIM THANKS TO ESSO
FUNDING |
 |
|
MORE people will be able to benefit from the warm waters of Toora Swimming
Pool thanks to the installation of a hoist which allows access to the pool
even for people who have little or no use of their legs.
The Ibis pool hoist from Healthcare Lifting was purchased with the help of a
$5,500 grant from the Esso BHP Barry Beach Marine Terminal and a $6,000
grant from Esso and BHP Billiton’s joint venture contributions program. A
further $1,000 each was received from Far Scandia of Farstad Shipping Pty
Ltd at Barry Beach, the Toora Lions Club and Foster Rotary Club. This money
paid for freight, installation and disability equipment to be used with the
hoist, and the project was coordinated by South Gippsland Shire.
Local physiotherapist Megan Inglefinger regularly brings groups from South
Gippsland Hospital, Banksia Lodge and Prom View Lodge to the pool for water
therapy and has welcomed the installation of the hoist, which was purchased
shortly before the close of the last swimming season in April. When the pool
re-opens in the September school holidays, Yarram and District Health
Service clients are expected to make use of the hoist, too.
The hoist is easy to use – pool staff are trained to use it - and can be
used in conjunction with a wheelchair or a sling. It is portable, but
secured by bolts, and is currently located at the shallow end of the pool.
“It has taken us two years to get the funding and then get the equipment
adjusted so that it fitted correctly over the lip of the pool. It’s great to
have it working now. We are very grateful to Esso,” said Tanya Cook. A
district nurse as well as a member of the pool committee, she had long
recognised the need for the hoist and worked long and hard for its purchase.
The hoist is a bonus at a pool which already caters well for people with
disabilities. There is a long, gently sloping, wheechair-friendly path
leading all the way from the gate to the pool, special showers, and the
water temperature is kept at a comfortable 29 to 30 degrees Celsius. Water
aerobics sessions are very popular at the pool, which has a permanent roof
and side shades which can be pulled down when required to provide protection
from the wind.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Long Jetty prospects gain
expert support |
 |
|
TOP representatives from Marine & Civil, the Western Australian marine
engineering company which built the Busselton Underwater Observatory and
also specialises in jetty restoration, met a range of stakeholder
representatives at Port Welshpool’s Long Jetty last Friday to look over the
site where an underwater observatory is proposed.
Marine and Civil’s Managing Director Kay Giles and Director/Engineer John
Neylon were visiting in the wake of positive feedback from one of their
company engineers, Allen Zorotovic, who spent time at Long Jetty in May to
estimate project possibilities and project costs.
A sizeable party of representatives was ready to welcome them and to discuss
possibilities about the jetty’s future prospects.
The group included the Member for Gippsland South Peter Ryan MLA, Gippsland
Ports Chief Executive Officer Nick Murray, Port Welshpool Working Group
members Gus Kok [President], Lyn Lucas, Laurie Robertson and Ena Pettigrove,
Welshpool and District Advisory Group members Paul Macphail and Kerry
Pinzone, Port Welshpool Underwater Observatory Feasibility Study author Bob
McDonald, South Gippsland Shire Councillors Jeanette Harding and Mohya
Davies, and Council staff Dirk Holwerda [Acting CEO], Marzia Maurilli
[Community Strengthening Facilitator] and Christian Stefani [Tourism
Coordinator].
There was no representative present specifically on behalf of the Department
of Sustainability and Environment.
AN ‘EASY JOB’
Speaking from a marine engineering background, Mr. Neylon described Long
Jetty as “an impressive structure” which was “in much better condition” than
the structure the company had worked on at Busselton.
He referred to the deck deterioration [surface holes, rotting timber and
projecting deck spikes] as “superficial” and stated that from his viewpoint,
restoration of Long Jetty for the purposes of developing an underwater
observatory would be “a very easy task.”
Mr Neylon suggested that the work would be comparatively a lot cheaper at
Port Welshpool since it didn’t have the level of problems experienced at
Busselton Jetty, which apart from being in poorer condition originally, is
in a cyclone area and an unprotected open sea location; aspects that
involved additional costs not applicable at Port Welshpool.
“Marine and Civil would love to be involved with this project,” Mr. Neylon
enthused.
Ms Giles cautioned that the longer such structures were left before
restoration and maintenance action was taken, the greater the costs involved
when work was carried out.
Mr. Murray explained that Gippsland Ports was the responsible authority for
the jetty as an asset.
He warmly agreed that it would be a wonderful outcome if Long Jetty could be
upgraded for tourist use, but was open in stating that the authority did not
have the budget capacity to either restore or maintain the jetty, and was
also an organisation overseeing port facilities for commercial use, not
tourism use.
Mr Murray was interested in finding out what construction lifetime was
envisaged by Marine and Civil, as that would affect both the material [for
example timber species] used for restoration and the cost of ongoing
maintenance.
“I prefer an enduring construction life because it reduces the burden of
maintenance,” he commented.
Mr. Neylon replied that he would expect the structure to last for another
100 years if it was well-maintained after refurbishment, even if it was
nominally described as having a 50-year design life.
He noted that the jetty was already a good age, having been built in 1937.
Ms Giles reminded the group that the underwater observatory at Busselton was
pivotal in generating significant income that was used to repair Busselton
jetty.
From the Shire’s view, Cr Harding - who is also a member of the Port
Welshpool Working Group - exclaimed that “it would be fantastic if it [the
refurbishment] can happen”, while Mr. Holwerda offered that Council would do
“whatever it could within its resources to achieve a good outcome.”
BUSINESS PLAN
Mr. McDonald stated that the next stage was for a Business Plan to be
completed for Long Jetty so that there was some calculated evidence of
tourism attraction and emphasised that “getting the jetty reopened as soon
as possible for pedestrians and recreational boats was essential.”
Grant funding has been sought to carry out such a Business Study, and Mr.
McDonald expected the success or otherwise of the grant application to be
known in the next few weeks.
Meanwhile, he was expecting information to come in such as VicRoads to
provide car visitation figures passing Telegraph Road into Port Welshpool
for both the pre-2003 period [before Long Jetty was closed to the public]
and the post-2003 period.
“In the past, value in tourism has been greatly underestimated, but now
organisations like the Department of Sustainability and Environment are
keeping user statistics and jetties are proving to be significant tourist
attractions.
“If Long Jetty had 40,000 visitors per year, that would be at the low end of
Victoria’s jetty visitation experience,” Mr. McDonald observed.
Mr. Ryan committed to taking the completed Business Plan to the State
Government as evidence of the project’s commercial viability, which would
support the case for funding the Long Jetty project.
He described the jetty as “one of the few structural icons in Eastern
Victoria” and pointed to the successful outcome in obtaining funding to
retain the Great Southern Rail Trail’s Pumphouse Bridge at Meeniyan despite
sceptics predicting that it couldn’t be done.
“We have a generational responsibility to preserve and enhance Long Jetty to
its former glory!” he proclaimed.
Ms Pinzone noted that there was a significant groundswell of widely-based
community support for the underwater observatory project and that she was
receiving a growing number of calls and offers for help from people around
the Gippsland region who were keen to see Long jetty opened and the project
proceeded with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |